Fishcam using Raspberry Pi and some network tricks

There are more articles about running a webcam using Raspberry Pi than Carter has pills. Why bother to create another? This one is unique insofar as I created a fishcam at a school with a restricted network. None of the reference articles I found discussed a way to get your stream onto the Internet except the simplistic approach only available to homeowners of setting up a rule on a home router. Pimylifeup’s article is typical of that genre.

Cooperating third party
To push this webcam out to the Internet when I had no way to allow inbound traffic to the Pi, I realized that I needed a cooperating third party. I looked briefly for a commercial service specializing in this. I did not find one. I suppose there is, but I don’t know. It was actually quicker to stop the search and use my own AWS server as the cooperating third party.

With a cooperating third party what you can do is set up a forwarder from the Pi to cooperating server on the Internet. So that’s what I did. More on that below.

Network restrictions
The Pi was given WiFi access to a school’s bring your own device (BYOD) WiFi. By trial and error (I did not initiate extensive port scans, etc so as to avoid acting like a hacker). I’m familiar with running a almost completely open Guest wireless. This BYOD was not that for some reason unknown to me. One of the first things I tried, to ssh to my server, was not going through. So I knew there were restrictions. Also PING did not work. So ICMP was blocked as well. But web browsing worked, and so did DNS queries. So TCP ports 80 and 443 were allowed, as well as UDP port 53 and possibly TCP port 53. I also observed there was no proxy server involved in the communication. So I simply tested a few other ports that I know are used from time-to-time: 2443 and 8443. If you a hit a server that is not protected by a firewall and not listening on a port that you are testing you will get a Connection reset if your packets are not blocked by a local firewall. I tested with the nc utility. nc -v <my_server> <port> I found a couple open ports this way. Next question: does the network care what protocol is running on that port? They might be looking for https and I was planning to run ssh. For a simple port blocker it might not distinguish what’s going on. That was indeed the case as I was able to run ssh on this non-standard port.

The single most comlicated thing was formulating the appropriate ssh command. I created a dedicated account on my server for this purpose. I embedded the password into the startup script I created using a utility called sshpass. This is not super secure but I wanted something running quickly.

Here’s that complicated command

sshpass -p <PASSWORD> ssh ‐f ‐N ‐R 8443:localhost:8081 ‐p 2443 <USERNAME>@<SERVER_IP>

That’s a mouthful! Let’s break it down. sshpass just permits you to run the command and not get a login prompt. It needs to be installed with a sudo apt-get sshpass.

The ssh command sets up a reverse tunnel. I have discussed it in my Access your Raspberry Pi from anywhere blog post, however, some things are different and more complicated here. Here we are setting up port 8443 on my server as the tunnel port which will be accessible to the Internet. It is terminated on the Raspberry Pi’s local port 8081 (the port that the motion package uses for the webcam). We had to use ssh to connect to port 2443 on my server because the school network blocked the standard port 22. Then <PASSWORD>, <USERNAME> and <SERVER_IP> are to be replaced with values specific for my server. I don’t want to publish them.

How I got my server to run ssh on port 2443 as well as port 22
This turned out to be one of the easiest things. It’s good to run your own server… In the file /ets/ssh/sshd_config the listening port was commented out, letting the defaul 22 be in effect. So I uncommented that and added port 2443 like this:

# Listen on multiple ports - DrJ 2/1/19
Port 22
Port 2443

Then a sudo service sshd restart and the server listens on both ports for ssh connections!

About the webcam itself
I just followed the Pimylife article as I mentioned. It talks about using the motion package which I’ve never used before. Now in my other posts you’ll see I do stuff with video on Raspberry Pi. In those we had to fight to get the lag time down and keep bandwidth low. I have to say by comparison this motion package is awful. Lag is a couple seconds. There is no sense whatsoever of true video. Just image, wait, next image, wait. No matter the fps setting. I did not have time to switch to a video package that works better. Anyway motion may provide some other advantages we could eventually use. So I just set it to 2 fps (frames per second) since it doesn’t really matter.

The fishcam is at fishcam. It’s not working right now – just showing black. I’m not sure why.

Auto starting
I’ve documented elsewhere the poor man’s way to start something upon initially booting the Pi: stuff the appropriate command into the crontab file.

So you edit your crontab file with a crontab -e. Then you enter

@reboot sleep 20; sshpass -p <PASSWORD> ssh ‐f ‐N ‐R 8443:localhost:8081 ‐p 2443 <USERNAME>@<SERVER_IP>

That just sleeps for 20 seconds as your Pi boots up, then establishes the reverse tunnel with that complicated command I explained earlier.

Usually thes tutorials start with an equipment list. For me that is the least interesting part. I used a Raspberry Pi 3 running Raspbian. For a camera I used one of my spare USB ELP cameras from my extensive work with USB cameras. While developing the solution I needed a keyboard, mouse and HDMI monitor. Once running, the only thing connected to the Pi is the USB camera and the micro USB power supply.

To be continued…

References and related
A very good guide for your typcial webcam-using-a-Raspberry-Pi situation, i.e., not what I am addressing in my article.

Access your Raspberry Pi from anywhere blog post

Run multiple USB cameras on your Raspberry Pi while keeping lag minimal.

For supplies we love visits to The Micro Center in Paterson, NJ. This past weekend we got Raspberry Pi 3’s for only $29. And the sales tax is only 3% and change.

Posted in Admin, Linux, Raspberry Pi | Tagged | Leave a comment

The IT Detective agency: Live hack caught, partially stopped

In my years at cybersecurity i’ve been sufficiently removed from the action that I’ve rarely been involved in an actual case. Until last night. A friend, whom I’ll call Jute, got a formal complaint about one of his hosted Windows servers.

We have detected multiple hacking attempts from your ip address (Hilfer Online) to access our systems.
> Log of attempts:
> – Hack attempt failed at 2019-01-17T14:22:41.6539784Z. Attempted user name: Not specified (typical for port scanners or denial of service attacks), system accessed: RDP, ip address accessed:
> – Hack attempt failed at 2019-01-17T14:22:26.2213808Z. Attempted user name: Not specified (typical for port scanners or denial of service attacks), system accessed: RDP, ip address accessed:
> – Hack attempt failed at 2019-01-17T14:22:10.6304194Z. Attempted user name: Not specified (typical for port scanners or denial of service attacks), system accessed: RDP, ip address accessed:
> Please investigate this problem.
> Sent using IP Ban Pro

Hack, cont.
I’ve changed the IPs to protect the guilty! But I’ve conveyed the specificity of the error reporting. Nice and detailed.

Jute has a Windows Server 2012 at that IP. He is not running a web server, so that conveniently and dramatically narrows the hackable footprint of his server. I ran a port scan and found ports 135, 139 and 3389 open. His provider (which is not AWS) offers a simple firewall which I suggested we use to block ports 135 and 139 which are for Microsoft stuff. He was running it as a local sever so I don’t tihnk he needed it.

Bright idea: use good ole netstat
The breakthrough came when I showed him the poor man’s packet trace:

netstat -an

from a CMD prompt. He ran that and I saw not one but two RDP connections. One we easily identified as his, but the other? It was coming form another IP belonging to the same provider! RDP is easily identified by just looking for the port 3389 connections. Clearly we had caught first-hand an unauthorized user.

I suggested a firewall rule to allow only his Verizon range to connect to server on port 3389. But, I am an enterprise guy, used to stateful firewalls. When we set it up we cut off his RDP session to his own server! Why? I quickly concluded this was amateur hour and a primitive, ip-chains-like stateless firewall. So we have to think about rules for each packet, not for each tcp connection.

Once we put in a rule to block access to ports 135 and 139, we also blocked Jute’s own RP session. So the instructions said once you use the firewall, an implicit DENY ALL is added to the bottom of the rules.

So we needed to add a rule like:


But his server needs to access web sites. That’s a touch difficult with a stateless firewall. You have to enter the “backwards” rule (outbound traffic is not restricted by firewall):


But he also needs to send smtp email, and look up DNS! This is getting messy, but we can do it:


We looked up the users and saw Administrator and another user Update. We did not recognize Update so he deleted it! And changed the password to Administrator.

Finally we decided we had to bump this hacker.

So we made two rules to allow him but deny the zombie computer:


Pyrrhic victory
Success. We bumped that user right out while permitting Jute’s access to continue. The bad news? A new interloper replaced it!

OK. So with another rule we can bump that one too.

Yup. Another success. another interloper jumps on in its place. So we bump that one. But I begin to suspect we are bailing the Titanic with a thimble. It’s amazing. Within seconds a blocked IP is being replaced with a new one.

We need a more sweeping restriction. So we reasoned that Jute will RP from his provider where his IP does not really change.

So we replace




and we also delete the specific reject rules.

But now at this point for some reason the implicit DENY ALL rule stops working. From my server I could do an nc -v 3389 and see that that port was open, though it should ont have been. So we have to add a cleanup rule at the bottom:


That did the trick. Port no longer opened.

There still appears in netstat -an listing the last interloper, but I think it just hasn’t been timed out yet. netstat -an also clearly shows (to me anyway) what they were doing: scanning large swaths of the Internet for other vulnerable servers! The tables were filled with SYN-SENT to port 3389 of consecutive IPs! Amazing.

So I think Jute’s server was turned into a zombie which was tasked with recruiting new zombies.

We had finally frozen them out.

Later that night
Late that same night he calls me in a panic. He uses a bunch of downstream servers and that wasn’t working! The downstream servers run on a range of ports 14800 – 15200.

Now bear in mind the provider only permits us 10 firewall rules, so it’s getting kind of tight. But we manage to squeeze in another rule:


He breathes a sigh of relief because this works! But I want him we are opening a slight hole now. Short term there’s nothing we can do. It’s a small exposure: 400 open ports out of 65000 possible. It should hold him for awile with any luck.

He also tried to apply all updates at my suggestion. I’m still not sure what vulnerability was (is) exploited.

Case: tentaively closed

Our first attempt to use the Windows firewall itself was not initially successful. We may return to it.

We catch a zombie computer totally exploiting RDP on a Windows 2012 server. We knocked it off and it was immediately repaced with another zombie doing the same thing. Their task was to find more zombies to join to the botnet. Inbound firewall rules defined on a stateless firewall were identified which stopped this exploitation while permitting desired traffic. Not so easy when you are limited to 10 firewall rules!

This is a case where IPBAN did us a favor. The system worked as it was supposed to.We got the alert, and acted on it immediately.

I’m not 100% sure which RP vulnerability was epxloited. It may have been an RCE – remote code execution not even requiring a valid logon.

Posted in Admin, DNS, Network Technologies, Security | Tagged | Leave a comment

Evaluation of WPI’s multiple camera coprocessor using Raspberry Pi

There’s some good and some not-so-good about the new WPI-provided way to handle multiple video streams using a Raspebrry Pi.

ELP Cameras problems
I have bought many of these ELP cameras last year and this. I may be a slow learner, but eventually it dawned on me that the problems I noticed seem to occur because of this model of USB camera. Finally this year we got a chance to explore this further. I got my hands on a Logitech webcam, the kind you use perched on top of a display monitor. We had this set up as a second camera while an ELP camera was the first. Then we rebooted the Pi a whole bunch of times to gather some stats. About 25% of the time there were problems with the ELP over about 10 tries. There were no problems with the Logitech. Here are various problems we’e seen:
– horizontal lines superimposed over image, and image dull
– ghosting, a corner of the field of view is shown in the center of the image
– sometimes the stream never starts and we’re not yet sure if that’s a camera problem or a software problem though I begin to suspect it’s an ELP problem
– one of my pinhole ELP cameras died

So: Logitech webcam is decidedly better.

Power problem
We pay extra attention to the power draw of the Pi. With two cameras attached and a 2 amp or 1.8 amp power supply the red LED power flashes. That is not good. It’s a sign of undervoltage. The command

vcgencmd get_throttled

on your Pi will tell you if there was an undervoltage condition. I see


when using a 2 amp power supply. Note that as far as we can see the camera display itself works just as well. We also have a 3 amp power supply. That produces a solid red led light and vcgencmd get_throttled produces a response of


which probably indicates there were no undervoltage conditions.

The problem we need to avoid for the Pi to attempt to draw more than 2 amps from the regulator. Doing so may shut it down. So we will try to use the Pi along with a powered USB hub.

Bandwidth constraints
We want to be well below 3 mbps for two cameras. How to get there while still providing a useful service. Initially we felt we could run the cameras at 320×240 resolution, 10 fps. But after much playing we found conditions under which we exceed 3 mbps though normally we were below that. I believe that the compressibility of the image is what matters. So a “rich” visudal field with lots of contrasting objects is the least compressible. That vaguely fits our findings as well. So we felt it important to prepare for the worst case. So we actually looked at supported resolutions and settled on 176×144 pixels! It sure isn’t much, agreed, but it’s still helpful. We blow up the images during the display. We use YUYV mode. MJPEG uses considerably more bandwidth.

Refresh trick
With this WPI software, the video streams never display the first time. You have to refresh the page for some reason. We wished to have a one click operation for viewing, however, to minimize the risk of operator error. So we used some old-fashioned META HTML tags to force a page refresh.

Our initial approach was to simply have the web page refresh itself every five seconds. This worked, but caused instability in the video stream itself and given a few minutes, would always crash the video stream. So we came up with an alternative that does a single page refresh. Unfortunately we’re not that conversant in Javascript (I’m sure there’s a way to do this with Javascript) so instead we wrote two HTML pages: a source page with the refresh, and a target page that does not refresh.

Initial page HTML source

<meta http-equiv="Refresh" content="1;url=file:///C:/users/aperture/Desktop/2019-no-refresh.htm">
<img src="" width=560 height=400>
<img src="" width=560 height=400>

And we size the browser window to just fit the two video streams side-by-side.

Target HTML source for 2019-no-refresh.htm

<img src="" width=560 height=400>
<img src="" width=560 height=400>

Timing and sequence of events
After the Ras Pi is powered up, we launch the initial page from the task bar where it was pinned, 20 seconds later.

It takes a bit of time, then it displays the side-by-side video streams as broken images.

The red LEDs on the Logitech webcams begin to glow.

(We know when we see both red LEDs glowing we are good to go by the way).

the refresh occurs automatically to the 2019-no-refresh.htm web page.

Two side-by-side video streams are displayed, each with 560×400 display dimensions.

References and related
My 2018 version of using the Raspebrry Pi to handle two USB cameras: USB webcam on Raspberry Pi

Field Management System spec for 2019
WPI PDF manual, Using a Ras Pi as Video coprocessor

Download compressed image from Github:

Logitech webcam:

FIRST FRC Networking Basics

Posted in Linux, Raspberry Pi | Leave a comment

Google Hangouts Meet – what do these IPs all have in common?

They all have been used by Google’s Hangouts Meet based on my observation.
If you have an environment which uses proxy authentication, the above IPs do not play well with that. So you’ll need to disable proxy authentication for them for Hangouts Meet to work.

Otherwise you can do the initial connect but wioll be dropped after about 45 seconds.

Finally, although you can look up each individually and learn of its association to Google, Google’s own documentation is devoid of any references to them. That is unfortunate.

So the IPs in actual use is probably much larger, but these are what I’ve observed over the course of a few days of testing.

What I’ve done
Google is very hard to reach. They only provide indirect means for regular users. So not knowing any insiders I submitted feedback at which is what they suggest. I provided a detailed description. I doubt they will do anything with my feedback. We’ll see.

Google has an undocumented dependency on a whole set of IPs for hangout Meets to actually work through a proxy which requires authentication. Contacting Google for more information is probably impossible, but I will try.

Posted in Admin, Proxy | Tagged | Leave a comment

Consumer Tech: amazing little Bluetooth adapter for your car

My old car I decided finally needed a touch of Bluetooth connectivity. But how to do it without spending a fortune?

The details
I found this amazingly inexpensive gadget on Amazon that describes itself as follows: Handsfree Call Car Charger,Wireless Bluetooth FM Transmitter Radio Receiver&Mp3 Music Stereo Adapter,Dual USB Port Charger Compatible for All Smartphones,Samsung Galaxy,LG,HTC,etc.

I guess it’s normally $16 but I bought on Cyber Monday so it was about $12. 12 dollars! I think if I had gone to the dealer for an after-market solution it would have been $500.

The bad first
Let’s get the bad out of the way, bearing in mind my expectations were rather low so I may be leaving out some obvious “of course it doesn’t have that…” type of stuff.

This device does an FM broadcast and you pick an unoccupied FM frequency to listen to it. On the other side it connects to a Bluetooth device such as a phone. In IT terms I’d call it a gateway since it converts one protocl to another (Bluetooth to FM). Having read the reviews, but not finding anything addressing my interests, my idea was to continue to use my FM stations, and put the station used by this device on a preset so when a call comes in to my phone I hit the station preset and accept the call on the device.
Well, you basically can’t listen to other FM stations as long as this thing is powered up. So even tuned to 88.7 at the far end of the dial, it interferes with stations up and down the dial for some reason. It’ not impossible but you’d have to have a high tolerance for static to use it that way.

Also, I’ve read that these little things break on some people after a few months. But I would no feel cheated, remember, low expectations?

The good
– microphone is good
– compatible with Samsung
– capable of audio program controls
– boots up quickly, maybe 10 seconds

My solution
I only really listen to NPR. I tried the WNYC app in the Playstore. I used to think it was buggy – stopping at random times. But I’ve had good luck my first few trips. Plays great through this thing! In many ways it’s better than FM because I don’t have to change NPR stations as I drive to work, etc, and its signal is often better. There is some static background however. Now my phone GPS talks to me through the speakers (it used to be silent in the car).

The unknown
Not sure about outbound calls to much. If you hit the button twice it seems to call the last dialed number. There are these settings U01, U02, U30. maybe those are for speed dialing?
Precisely why it has to so broadly interfere with all FM stations is a mystery.

Being a thoughtful person, I also wonder what it does to the FM reception of cars around me, ha ha? Could they pick up my call? Now that I think of it, I do remember hearing someone’s phone call on my FM radio once, many years ago. Use of an aux cord would be a way around that, but this little device does not support that.

The amazing
How cuold they pack all this tech, make something that basically works as it’s supposed to, and sell it for $12? I’m in awe.

References and related

Posted in Consumer Tech | Tagged | Leave a comment

Great serial port concentrator: Raritan Dominion

Every now and then you find a product that is a leap ahead of where you were. Such is the case for us with regards to our product of choice for serial consoles.

The old
For Bluecoat (Symantec) proxy and AV systems, we had been using an ancient Avocent CPS device. It permitted ssh connection. It was slow and the menu very limited. But it did permit us to connect multiple serial consoles to one concentrator device at least.
For low-end firewalls we had been using DigiConnects, one per firewall. They are small, which may be thir one advantage. They are tricky to initially set up. Then they are slow to use.

In with the new
We heard about the Raritan Dominion line of products, stranegly enough, from some IT guys in Europe. It’s strange because they are right here in New Jersey – the company name probably comes form the Raritan river. But our usual reseller never heard of them. The specific device is a Dominion SXII.

It’s so much better than those older products. You can use their GUI to connect. This is a vendor who got their act together and eliminated Java. So many other security vendors have yet to do that, incredible as it is to say that.
It tries to autosense the wiring of the serial connector. That doesn’t always work, but it’s very easy for you to hardwire a port as DCE, or if that dosn’t work, try DTE. I use one type for my Symantec devices, another for firewalls.

Labelling the port with meaningful names is a snap, of course.

The Digis would interfere with the reboot process of the firewall so we’d have to detach them if we were going to rbeoot the firewall. These do not. So much better…

You can combine them with power control but we aren’t going to do that.

Don’t want to use the GUI? No problem, console access through ssh is also possible. Of configure dedicated ports that you ssh to for individual consoles.

Sending signals and cleanly disconnecting is easy with their menuss. Connecting to multiple consoles is alsono problem.

They have something called in-the-rack access. I know this will be useful but I haven’t figured out how to use it yet. But if it is what it sounds like it is, it will allow me to be in the server room and access any console by using a direct connection of some sort to the Dominion SXII.

And they’re just plain faster. A lot faster.

And, considering, they’re not so expensive.

They worked so much better than expected that we pretty much immediately filled up the ports with firewalls and other stuff.

A leap forward in productivity was realized by utilizing Raritn’s Dominion SXII serial port concentrator. Commissioning new security gear has never been esaier…

References and related
Raritan’s web site:

Posted in Admin, Security | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Counting active leases on an old ISC DHCP server

Checkpoint Gaia offers a DHCP service, but it ias based on a crude and old dhcp daemon implementation frmo ISC. Doesn’t give you much. Mostly just the file /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases, which it constantly updates. A typical dhcp client entry looks like this:

lease {
  starts 5 2018/11/16 22:32:59;
  ends 6 2018/11/17 06:32:59;
  binding state active;
  next binding state free;
  hardware ethernet 30:d9:d9:20:ca:4f;
  uid "\0010\331\331 \312O";
  client-hostname "KeNoiPhone";

The details

So I modified a perl script to take all those lines and make sense of them.
I called it
Here it is

# from - DrJ 11/15/18
my $VERSION=0.03;
##my $leases_file = "/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases";
my $leases_file = "/tmp/dhcpd.leases";
##use strict;
use Date::Parse;
my $now = time;
##print $now;
# 12:22 PM 11/15/18 EST
#my $now = "1542302555";
my %seen;       # leases file has dupes (because logging failover stuff?). This hash will get rid of them.
open(L, $leases_file) or die "Cant open $leases_file : $!\n";
undef $/;
my @records = split /^lease\s+([\d\.]+)\s*\{/m, <L>;
shift @records; # remove stuff before first "lease" block
## process 2 array elements at a time: ip and data
foreach my $i (0 .. $#records) {
    next if $i % 2;
    ($ip, $_) = @records[$i, $i+1];
    ($ip, $_) = @records[$i, $i+1];
    s/^\n+//;     # && warn "leading spaces removed\n";
    s/[\s\}]+$//; # && warn "trailing junk removed\n";
    my ($s) = /^\s* starts \s+ \d+ \s+ (.*?);/xm;
    my ($e) = /^\s* ends   \s+ \d+ \s+ (.*?);/xm;
    ##my $start = str2time($s);
    ##my $end   = str2time($e);
    my $start = str2time($s,UTC);
    my $end   = str2time($e,UTC);
    my %h; # to hold values we want
    foreach my $rx ('binding', 'hardware', 'client-hostname') {
        my ($val) = /^\s*$rx.*?(\S+);/sm;
        $h{$rx} = $val;
    my $formatted_output;
    if ($end && $end < $now) {
        $formatted_output =
            sprintf "%-15s : %-26s "              . "%19s "         . "%9s "     . "%24s    "              . "%24s\n",
                    $ip,     $h{'client-hostname'}, ""              , $h{binding}, "expired"               , scalar(localti
me $end);
    else {
        $formatted_output =
            sprintf "%-15s : %-26s "              . "%19s "         . "%9s "     . "%24s -- "              . "%24s\n",
                    $ip,     $h{'client-hostname'}, "($h{hardware})", $h{binding}, scalar(localtime $start), scalar(localti
me $end);
    next if $seen{$formatted_output};
    print $formatted_output;

Even that script produces a thicket of confusing information. So then I further process it. I call this script

# DrJ 11/15/18
# bring over current dhcp lease file from firewall FW-1
echo fetching lease file dhcpd.leases
scp admin@FW-1:/var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases /tmp
# analyze it. this should show us active leases
echo analyze dhcpd.leases
DIR=`dirname $0`
$DIR/|grep active|grep -v expired > /tmp/intermed-results
# intermed-results looks like:
#   : "android-7fe22a415ce21c55" (50:92:b9:b8:92:a0)    active Thu Nov 15 11:32:13 2018 -- Thu Nov 15 15:32:13 2018
#   : "android-283a4cb47edf3b8c" (98:39:8e:a6:4f:15)    active Thu Nov 15 11:37:23 2018 -- Thu Nov 15 15:32:14 2018
#   : "other-Phone"            (38:25:6b:79:31:60)    active Thu Nov 15 11:32:24 2018 -- Thu Nov 15 15:32:24 2018
#   : "iPhone-de-Lucia"          (34:08:bc:51:0b:ae)    active Thu Nov 15 07:32:26 2018 -- Thu Nov 15 15:32:26 2018
# further processing. remove the many duplicate lines
echo count active leases
awk '{print $1}' /tmp/intermed-results|sort -u|wc -l > /tmp/dhcp-active-count
echo count is `cat /tmp/dhcp-active-count`

And that script gives my what I believe is an accurate count of the active leases. I run it every 10 minutes from SiteScope and voila, we have a way to make sure we’re coming close to running out of IP addresses.

Posted in Admin, Perl | Tagged | Leave a comment

The IT Detective Agency: Cisco Jabber Carriage Return problem fixed

Cisco Jabber is a pretty good IM application. I’ve seen how it is a true productivity enhancer. But not so much when it doesn’t work right.

The symptoms
I hadn’t rebooted for awhile. I had a bunch of open conversations. Then all of a sudden, I could no longer send additional Jabbers (IMs, messages, or whatever you call them). I would type my message, hit ENTER (<CR>), and that action would just give send the cursor to the beginnning of a new line below the one I typed in my message box, like a typewriter. I soon realized that I had no way to SEND what I was typing because you use ENTER to do that!

A quick Internet search revaled nothing (hence this article). So I restarted Jabber and that got things working again, but of course I lost all my conversations.

As this happened again, I looked more closely. I eventually noticed this security pop-up was associated with this ENTER problem:

Being a security-minded person I kept clicking No to this pop-up.

Then I noticed the correlation. As soon a I clicked No on that pop-up, my ‘s began to work as expecetd. After a few minutes they stop working again, I hunt for the pop-up, and click No again. And it goes on like this all day.

Hint on finding the pop-up
Jabber has a main narrow window which cpontains all the contacts and other links, and the conversation window. Highlight the main narrow wnidow and the pop-up will appear (if therer is one). Otherwise it can be hard to find.

Why is there a security alert?
Being a srot of certificate expert, I felt obliged to delve into the certificate itself to help whoever may try to solve this. I captured the certificate and found that it is a self-signed certificate! No wonder it’s not accepted. So our Unified Communications vendor, in their infinite wisdom, used self-signed certificates for some of this infrastructure. Bad idea.

I suppose I could accept it, but I’d prefer they fix this. I don’t want end users becoming comfortable overriding security pop-ups.

The sudden inability to use ENTER within Cisco Jabber is explained and a corrective action is outlined.

Case closed!

Posted in Web Site Technologies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Latest spear phishing: your password plus extortion

Three users that I know at a certain company have all received spear phishing emails worded very much like this one:

Spear Phishing shows you your password and extorts you

The details
I don’t really have many more details. One user described it to me as follows. He got this email at work. It displayed to him a password which he uses for some of his personal accounts and maybe for a few work-related logins. He said the wording was very similar to the one I showed in the above screenshot.

This one comes from IP, which is a legitimate Microsoft-owned IP. So it has an air of legitimacy to traditoinal spam filters.

I htikn all the users are reluctant to pursue the normal methods o reporting phishing, which involve sending the entire email to some unknown group of analysts because the email does in fatc contain a legitimate password of theirs. This makes it that much harder for an incident repsonse team to kick into gear and start a detailed analysis.

I mentioned three users – those are just the ones brought to my attention, and I’m not even in the business any more. So by extrapolation, this has probably occurred to many more users at just this one company. It’s disturbing…

November update
Another one came in to a different user. I have the text of this one and have only changed the recipient information.

From: <>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 11:55 AM
To: Dr J <>
Subject: has been hacked! Change your password immediately!
I have very bad news for you.                                                                                                                                 03/08/2018 - on this day I hacked your OS and got full access to your account On this day your account has password: drj1234
So, you can change the password, yes.. But my malware intercepts it every time.
How I made it:
In the software of the router, through which you went online, was a vulnerability.
I just hacked this router and placed my malicious code on it.
When you went online, my trojan was installed on the OS of your device.
After that, I made a full dump of your disk (I have all your address book, history of viewing sites, all files, phone numbers and addresses of all your contacts).
A month ago, I wanted to lock your device and ask for a not big amount of btc to unlock.
But I looked at the sites that you regularly visit, and I was shocked by what I saw!!!
I'm talk you about sites for adults.
I want to say - you are a BIG pervert. Your fantasy is shifted far away from the normal course!
And I got an idea....
I made a screenshot of the adult sites where you have fun (do you understand what it is about, huh?).
After that, I made a screenshot of your joys (using the camera of your device) and glued them together.
Turned out amazing! You are so spectacular!
I'm know that you would not like to show these screenshots to your friends, relatives or colleagues.
I think $709 is a very, very small amount for my silence.
Besides, I have been spying on you for so long, having spent a lot of time!
Pay ONLY in Bitcoins!
My BTC wallet: 1FgfdebSqbXRciP2DXKJyqPSffX3Sx57RF
You do not know how to use bitcoins?
Enter a query in any search engine: "how to replenish btc wallet".
It's extremely easy
For this payment I give you two days (48 hours).
As soon as this letter is opened, the timer will work.
After payment, my virus and dirty screenshots with your enjoys will be self-destruct automatically.
If I do not receive from you the specified amount, then your device will be locked, and all your contacts will receive a screenshots with your "enjoys".
I hope you understand your situation.
- Do not try to find and destroy my virus! (All your data, files and screenshots is already uploaded to a remote server)
- Do not try to contact me (you yourself will see that this is impossible, the sender address is automatically generated)
- Various security services will not help you; formatting a disk or destroying a device will not help, since your data is already on a remote server.
P.S. You are not my single victim. so, I guarantee you that I will not disturb you again after payment!
 This is the word of honor hacker
I also ask you to regularly update your antiviruses in the future. This way you will no longer fall into a similar situation.
Do not hold evil! I just do my job.
Good luck.

A new disturbing type of spear phishing campaign is presented. The email presents an actual password (no hint as to how the hacker obtained it) and then tries to extort the user for quite a bit of money to avoid reputation-damaging disclosures to their close associates.

References and related
This is a useful site, albeit a little frightening, that shows you the many sites that have leaked your Email address due to a data breach:

Posted in Scams, Spam | Leave a comment

Voice and data vlans on one switch port, no vlan tagging: how does that work?

We had a Cisco video conference unit pick up an IP from a data vlan whereas we expected it to pick it up from a voice vlan, where we had assigned it a static IP. What happened?

The details
I have to admit I never paid attention to the switch ports in the offices. All these years and I didn’t really appreciate the fact that you can plug in either a PC or a Cisco phone to the same switch port, yet the PC “knows” to go onto a data vlan while the phone “knows” to put itself onto a voice vlan. How cuold that be?

Naively, just talking it out, I had this jumble of “facts” in my mind:

– sharing vlans on one switch port is done through vlan tagging
– the equipment plugged in must know the switch port is using vlan tagging or else disastrous results occur (see this post for some examples)
– if in addition you’re a PC using DHCP, how would you know which valn to go onto? How would you learn the connection is tagged?
– well, there can be a native vlan in addition to tagged vlans. Maybe they used that?

Fortunately I have some friends with access to the switch config. Here it is for one specific typical port:

interface FastEthernet0/2
description Data & Voice vlanC
switchport access vlan 103
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 703

I puzzled over that for awhile because, well, what does it mean?? In my world of servers you have two port types: access ports and truink ports. Trunk ports are the ones that have tagged vlans. Access ports provide a single unttagged vlan’s traffic to the port.

It’s pretty clearly declaring this switch port to be an access port, not a trunk port. And yet two vlans are referred to. There’s this command I’ve never seen or used before swithcport voice. How does this fit with the jumble of facts above? The jumble of facts need to be amended…

I asked another expert and he said he heard that the Cisco phones use something called LLDP – link layer discovery porotocol. From researching the predecessor protocol was CDP – Cisco Discovery protcol.

Switchport voice vlan 703 is something like introducing tagging for vlan703, if I read the Cisco documentation correctly.

The magic happens
This is often described as magic or voodoo so we will treat it like that too! A Cisco phone uses LLDP to learn from the switch that the voice vlan is 703. Then somehow it tags(?) its traffic to use only that vlan, even for its DHCP discover. A PC or any other normal host by contrast does not use LLDP and is only exposed to the data vlan 103 (the “native” vlan) so it gets an IP from doing DHCP discover on that vlan.

Do I believe my own explanation? Not really. It’s the best I got. I really should do a packet trace to confirm but who has the time?

That video conference unit? They say when they boot it a second time it jumps onto the correct vlan and picks up the desired static IP. Again, no one’s really sure why.

Strange DHCP behavious on the part of a Cisco video conference unit forces us to think through how data + voice on one switch port might actually be working on a typical Cisco-powered office environment. We probably – definitely – didn’t nail it, but we must be close to the essentially correct answer.

References and related
As always Wikipedia has an article somewhat explaining LLDP

Posted in Network Technologies | Tagged , | Leave a comment